back to top

Top 5 This Week

spot_img
spot_img

Related Posts

Northeastern State Keeps Voters in the Dark About $1 Billion in Migrant Spending

Massachusetts is facing a growing controversy as Republicans demand transparency from the state’s Democratic leadership regarding a staggering $1 billion in what they claim is secret migrant spending related to the ongoing migrant crisis.

The state’s GOP has taken a firm stand, filing public records requests to Governor Maura Healey’s administration, seeking detailed information on how taxpayer dollars are being allocated for shelters, meals, and other related costs as the state grapples with an influx of approximately 50,000 illegal migrants since President Joe Biden took office in 2021.

The situation has reached a boiling point, particularly in the Boston area, where local outrage has been ignited by decisions like the one made by the Stoughton school district. The district controversially cut bus services for local children while maintaining them for young migrants living in shelters, a move that has left many residents feeling betrayed and concerned about the state’s priorities.

Amidst this growing discontent, Amy Carnevale, the state’s GOP chairwoman, has stepped forward to demand accountability and transparency from the Healey administration. “The administration has shrouded nearly $1 billion in spending in secrecy, leaving Massachusetts residents in the dark,” Carnevale stated. She further accused the administration of withholding critical information on over 600 incidents involving police, fire, and emergency medical services (EMS), all related to the migrant crisis.

Carnevale’s accusations extend to claims that Healey’s team has been deliberately obstructing the flow of information to the public, particularly when reporters have sought answers about the costs associated with the migrant crisis. According to Carnevale, the administration has been “blocking them at every turn,” raising serious questions about the transparency and integrity of the state’s leadership.

In response to these concerns, Carnevale has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, demanding detailed records of the state’s spending on housing for migrants. This request seeks the names of government and private entities involved in providing emergency shelters, the locations of these shelters, and any public safety issues that have arisen, along with corresponding police and emergency reports.

The urgency of these demands is underscored by the fact that Governor Healey’s administration declared a state of emergency last August, citing the presence of over 20,000 migrants in Massachusetts’ shelter system. Investigations have since revealed that this surge in migrants has not only strained services but has also consumed vast amounts of taxpayer money, with significant concerns about how these funds are being managed.

In one striking example, CBS News Boston obtained documents in February showing that the state had entered into 17 contracts totaling $116 million to house migrant families through June. Among these was a particularly alarming no-bid $10 million contract with a company tasked with providing meals to migrants. In some instances, the state paid hotels as much as $64 per person per day for meals, including $16 for breakfast, $17 for lunch, and $31 for dinner.

The situation has become so dire that the Republican-led city of Taunton took legal action against its only hotel, which had entered into a $10 million-a-year deal with the state to serve as an emergency shelter for migrants. The city sued the 155-room Clarion Hotel, demanding $115,000 in compensation for housing more migrant families than the facility could safely accommodate.

Carnevale’s criticism of Healey’s administration doesn’t stop at financial transparency. She has accused the administration of operating behind a “veil of secrecy” and called for immediate accountability. “Enough is enough,” Carnevale declared. “The public deserves transparency. Release the details on the vendors profiting from this crisis and the public safety issues affecting our communities.”

This demand for transparency comes on the heels of a report from the conservative Center for Immigration Studies, which warned that the migrant crisis is pushing Massachusetts toward financial ruin. The report suggests that the 50,000 illegal migrants who have entered the state since Biden became president are placing an unsustainable burden on schools, healthcare, and other essential services. According to the report’s author, Jessica Vaughan, this influx could drain state coffers of a staggering $1.8 billion over the next two years.

Vaughan’s report also highlights the long-term fiscal challenges posed by the migrant crisis. Even though some illegal migrants may work and pay taxes, the revenue generated will likely fall far short of covering the cost of social services for the estimated 355,000 migrants currently in Massachusetts. Vaughan described the situation as a “looming fiscal disaster” for the state’s taxpayers, warning that the cost of accommodating these migrants could reach an alarming $1.8 billion over the next two years alone.

As Massachusetts struggles to manage this crisis, the state’s leadership has come under intense scrutiny. Governor Healey, along with eight other governors from states heavily impacted by migration, has appealed to the White House and Congress for federal assistance. However, Vaughan argues that even emergency grants may not be enough to resolve the state’s financial woes. Instead, she advocates for cutting welfare payouts to migrants, cracking down on employers who hire undocumented workers, and ending sanctuary policies that protect illegal migrants from deportation.

The situation in Massachusetts is a stark reminder of the broader challenges facing the nation as the debate over immigration continues to rage, particularly in the context of the 2024 presidential race. With Republican nominee Donald Trump promising to launch mass deportations if he returns to the White House, the issue of illegal immigration is sure to remain a contentious and divisive topic in the months ahead.

Popular Articles